Towards a moralization of bibliometrics? A response to Kyle Siler.
Gingras, Y. (2022). Towards a moralization of bibliometrics? A response to Kyle Siler. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(1), 315-318.
Gingras, Y. (2022). Towards a moralization of bibliometrics? A response to Kyle Siler. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(1), 315-318.
In a recent letter to QSS, Kyle Siler (2021), made harsh comments against the decision of the editors to publish a controversial paper signed by Alessandro Strumia (2021) about gender differences in high-energy physics. My aim here is to point to the elements in Siler’s letter that are typical of a new tendency to replace rational and technical arguments with a series of moral statements and ex cathedra affirmations that are not supported by cogent arguments. Such an approach can only be detrimental to rational debates within the bibliometric research community.
Ce contenu a été mis à jour le 30 mai 2022 à 9 h 54 min.